QOS PROJECT TELECONFERENCE MEETING

September 19, 2000

 

 

Purpose

Discuss status of QOS physics and engineering studies, review the options for the CE experiment,

choose a reference plasma and coil cofiguration, and discuss the work needed

for the December 18-20 NCSX PVR and March QOS reviews

 

Morning

CONFIGURATION SELECTION

9:00-9:15

General Issues -- J. Lyon

Programmatic logic and considerations affecting decisions

9:15-10:15

 

Main Features of Configuration Candidates -- A. Ware

2 and 3 field period low-bootstrap current configurations

Higher bootstrap, higher beta configurations

10:15-10:45

DISCUSSION

10:45-11:00

BREAK

11:00-11:20

Kink and vertical stability for higher-bootstrap configurations -- G.Y. Fu

11:20-11:40

Transport Assessments for Selecting Reference Configuration -- D. Spong

Electron and ion neoclassical transport, energetic orbit losses

11:40-12:10

 

Modular Coils Assessments for Configuration Candidates

NESCOIL sheet current calculations -- P. Valanju

COILOPT modular coils for candidate configurations -- D. Strickler

Vacuum and 1.6% beta flux surfaces, configuration flexibility -- J. Lyon

12:10-12:30

DISCUSSION

12:30-1:30

LUNCH BREAK

 

 

 

 

 

Afternoon

EXPERIMENTAL IMPLEMENTATION AND ISSUES

1:30-2:00

Engineering Issues Affecting Configuration Choice -- B. Nelson

Modular coils (forces, structure, and cooling); TF and PF coils options; Vacuum vessel

2:00-2:45

Experimental Considerations for Configuration Choice

Heating and current drive issues -- D. Rasmussen

Vacuum, PMIs, and divertor issues -- P. Mioduszewski

2:45-3:10

DISCUSSION

3:10-3:20

COFFEE BREAK

3:20-4:00 

 

Issues, Choices, and Next Steps -- all

Key issues

Choices ------ 2 vs. 3 field periods, Low bootstrap vs higher bootstrap, Internal vacuum vessel vs. external belljar

Work emphasis and schedule issues

4:00

ADJOURN